** out of ****
Through some critics and audiences, M. Night Shyamalan is
seeing what I would call an unearned comeback through The Visit, which is his
latest film after a long string of idiotic thrillers that had lost him a lot of
respect. I’ve never seen a director’s career like his. His early films (mainly The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable) were so absolutely strong that I would
have never anticipated such aimless fantasy (Lady in the Water) or such inept
direction of human behavior (The Happening) from the same director in later films.
For a director whose career has been a needless letdown, the
choice to delve into found-footage filmmaking is an obviously terrible idea
since that entire subgenre has been almost as disappointing as Shyamalan. This
trendy and inexpensive approach to making a movie seems rather desperate on his
part, but it also seems to be paying off for him at the moment.
The Visit is about a couple of kids (Ed Oxenbould and
Olivia DeJonge) sent to meet their grandparents for the first time. Their
mother (Kathryn Hahn) is eager to go on a cruise with her new boyfriend and
after reconnecting with her parents via social media, she has decided to send
her children on a train to stay with them in rural Pennsylvania.
The “found footage” perspective is provided by the older
sister, who is an aspiring filmmaker bringing along cameras to document their visit.
After meeting the old couple (The amazing Peter McRobbie and Deanna Dunagan) at the train
station, they’re taken out to a remote home where despite a welcoming
impression, are provided a questionable curfew as well as boundary rules. When
these rules are defied, the kids witness their grandparents displaying some
very odd behavior, which is rationalized as senility.
This movie has three obvious problems: 1. The setup of a loving
mother sending her own children to stay with their grandparents, from whom she
ran away a decade ago, isn’t the typical first step for making amends with
one’s kin. 2. The behavior exhibited by the old couple very early in the film
would be enough to send any child running to the next closest farm house, even
if it could be legitimized as dementia. 3. The documentarian ambition of the
older sister to continue filming every terror she encounters defies any
relatable sense of self-preservation.
With the suspension of disbelief ready to implode during
most parts of the movie, there’s almost no involvement to be felt, but I will
not deny the movie has a few big scares. A lot of situations, no matter how
ridiculous are well staged and the actors all do great work.
There’s a major argument among some critics that this movie
is a very dark comedy. The movie rests on an arc of sincerity that makes it
impossible for me to see it as such. I see the humor in the insanity of its
campy scares tapping into buried repulsion some audience members may feel about
the elderly, but I found it to be in bad taste.
I take no issues with horror movies that aim for smutty
politically incorrect concepts, as long as they commit to an R-rating so the
movie may wink at its adult audience. This movie, however, is PG-13, which
essentially invites the whole family to join in on the “old people are nasty”
scares and I find that somewhat morally repugnant. Having the younger brother
be a wannabe rapper as comic relief, so that he can do bad raps about the
creepy old folks, is maybe as cringe-worthy as the R-rated gross-out moments
that infiltrate the conclusion to the movie.